Linux Mint 7 “Gloria” released

The Linux Mint team released their latest version “Gloria” a few days ago, so I was looking forward to getting it installed and configured on at least one of my boxes. I’m impressed.

Linux Mint 7 “Gloria” was released a few days ago, and given what I’d seen about from the comments posted in response to its release candidate the past couple weeks, I was anxious to give it a run. I updated one of my laptops (not the netbook) to it yesterday morning, replacing the Ubuntu 9.04 installation. Being based on Ubuntu, I didn’t expect any problems. The installation went smoothly, as expected, with just one minor hitch: the Mint install image doesn’t seem to include the needed Broadcom driver for the wireless card in this particular laptop so I had to briefly put it on a wired network connection here at home to go grab the needed third party driver. (This is the one significant difference I saw, compared to both previous Mint releases and Ubuntu’s release; given that it wasn’t a big deal to get past, I didn’t do much digging past that. For someone without a wired connection using a similar box, it might be more challenging to get past.)

Mint's default dark GNOME theme with contrasting greens is very attractive, and the most polished Mint to date.
Mint's default dark GNOME theme with contrasting greens is very attractive, and the most polished Mint to date.

This version continues the Mint team’s obvious emphasis on a polished initial experience with the distro. It is, in my opinion, the most polished of the Mints to date, with a dark GNOME theme and an emphasis on green for highlights, screen background, and icons. It is very attractive, even though I am generally not a big fan of darker themes.

Total time to back stuff up, install, and then get all of the usual stuff installed and configured was less than two hours. That includes the initial installation, along with getting Apache, PHP, MySQL, Eclipse (I went with the Galileo RC1 package this time) along with the AFAE plugin, Songbird, and Railo installed and configured, along with getting WordPress installed locally and running a development version of this blog, and hacking the default GNOME theme to squeeze the scrollbars down a skosh to a more efficient and attractive width.

YMMV but I’m very impressed.

Busy Couple Weeks in Open Source Land

It’s been a busy couple of weeks with new releases (and pre-releases) of several key software packages, and the benefits of using a rolling-release distribution of Linux like Arch Linux are again pronounced.

It has been a pretty busy couple of weeks in the land of open source software:

  •‘s new version 3 made it into the regular repositories in Arch Linux last week. One of the aspects of a rolling release distribution like Arch is how quickly stuff like this becomes available particularly in light of the recent announcement by the Ubuntu team that they will stay on version 2.4.1 in their next upcoming release. Both my Arch boxes have been updated, and I’m impressed with the changes and the speed improvements.
  • Firefox’s beta 1 of version 3.1 was released up, too, and I’m running it on 3 of my boxes, including my Mac at work. It feels much faster — even without turning on the disabled-by-default new JavaScript engine which is still reportedly pretty buggy — and some of the UI changes are pretty nice.
  • Mozilla Messaging release an alpha 3 of the next release of Thunderbird, and I’m running that as my primary mail client on my Mac at work. It has picked up some nice Mac UI changes, provides integration with the Mac address book, and the re-tooled IMAP support is noticably better that the current stable version 2 branch of Thunderbird. And how could you not like a mail client named “Shredder”?
  • GNOME‘s latest release — version 2.24 — made it into the stable repositories earlier this week, and both of my Arch boxes are now running it. Most of the changes aren’t all that obvious at this point, but it is noticably faster and feels more responsvive. The upgrade was painless (aside from the big download) and seems to have gone flawlessly on both boxes.
  • Finally, WordPress released a minor point release to fix a security hole.

Progress with Arch Linux

It has been several weeks since I started playing with Arch Linux. I’ve two of my three systems running under this distro and figured it was worth posting at least a short blurb on my impressions and experience…

It has been several weeks since I started playing with Arch Linux. I’ve two of my three systems running under this distro and figured it was worth posting at least a short blurb on my impressions and experience…

Both (impressions and experience) have been very positive. I’m running it on two older laptops right now, but have not yet migrated my primary system over yet, and won’t for a bit. The installation experience is very different than Linux Mint (my preferred distro to this point) in several ways: it’s text-based (which in and of itself is not a bad thing, particularly within the context of the Arch philosophy) and because the installation itself really does just install a basic core system, getting to the point where you have a fully-populated desktop environment along with the other needed tools installed, configured, and running takes quite a bit longer. My slow progress really doesn’t have as much to do with the installation process itself as it does with the fact that I am working through it in chunks of about 15-20 minutes each day.

At this point, the two systems in question are probably 90-plus percent “finished” in terms of getting everything I know I need or want for an initial system. Having said that, however, that 90% is a fully functional box with everything I need to access the ‘net, use the system on day-to-day basis to do what I need to do, supports multimedia, deals with removable media (including my camera), and has a working LAMP stack with my blog running locally.

Keeping the system updated and installing additional packages so far has been a non-issue, and I’m impressed with pacman, Arch’s package manager. No complaints or issues there to date. In fact, the only real issue I’ve had at all is an occasional and very intermittent hang on booting at a particular point in the startup process. It’s very intermittent and requires a hard reset, but once past that point in the startup, the system has proven to be rock solid. That particular little nasty is the subject of an on-going thread on the distro’s forums, and others are occasionally seeing it, as well…

Speaking of the forums, the distro’s wiki and forums are definitely two of the distro’s strong points. Both are active, and the documentation on the wiki is excellent both in its coverage and its quality.

The biggest difference for me with this distro is speed. Startup on both of these systems is well under 30 seconds from power on to login under gdm. Shutdown on both is under 10 seconds. What’s the difference? Clearly there are far fewer services running here than on a stock Ubuntu or Mint installation, since the only stuff running is what I’ve installed and configured. It makes me wonder what all that other stuff is doing for me on previous distros because I haven’t missed any of it yet…

In short: so far, so good. At some point, unless I step into a massive hole somewhere along the lines, I will probably move my last (and primary) box over to Arch.

Geek Shorts

A few miscellaneous geek blurbs, in no particular order of importance… and Happy Birthday, Ian!

A few miscellaneous short geek items:

  • I’ve been looking at Arch Linux lately as a possible distro to try for a bit, and took the plunge last night on an older Dell Latitude laptop. I’m still partway through the installation even as I write this (in the middle of installing the GNOME desktop, actually). The basic OS install went smoothly, but I got stuck for a bit trying to get the nVidia video drivers configured; got past that hump and it’s plugging away at this point. More to come on that… if it looks like it will be worth hanging on to. It’s a bleeding edge rolling release distribution, meaning they don’t release new versions every x months with no updates to new versions of the applications (generally only minor patches and security updates are made available) between releases; their model feeds updates to apps as they become available, as as long as one periodically updates stuff, they are always current and there’s no need to re-install a version of the OS every six months or so. Maybe better, maybe not, but different. Part of what has impressed me is the level of polish on the documentation available for the distro, particularly for someone looking at it as a potential new user (see their beginner’s guide as a good example).
  • Being restricted to the touchpad on a laptop is slow and painful; my mouse is dangling off the back of the in-progress Arch box at the moment. Note to self: buy a second USB mouse to have hanging around for times like these.
  • Speaking of Linux, Wednesday’s xkcd Web comic strip struck a chord with me, having watched Ian over the past few years. See for yourself.
  • Speaking of Ian and geek stuff, today marks his 16th birthday. Happy Birthday, Ian!
  • I finished re-reading William Gibson’s Count Zero a week or so ago and I’m part way through Neuromancer right now; I keep forgetting how much I like his writing. And having gone back and started rereading these two classics of the cyberpunk genre, I am amazed at how often I find references to things from them.

Linux Mint 5 Released

Looks like I will be rebuilding a couple boxes…

Late yesterday, the latest release of my favorite Linux distro was made public. As much as I’ve liked having Ubuntu’s 8.04 release on my laptop, I’ll be ditching it within the next few days to give Linux Mint 5 a hard look. Mint has been my distro of choice for better than a year now, and based on that history, what I’ve read about the changes, and my positive experience with Ubuntu 8.04 (upon which this release of Mint is based), I don’t believe I will be disappointed.

I will follow up with more on this after the first of my re-builds.